Comments on: heads-up: watch out for dependencies on “Plone” http://david.wglick.org/2009/heads-up-watch-out-for-dependencies-on-plone/ Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:29:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3 By: davisagli http://david.wglick.org/2009/heads-up-watch-out-for-dependencies-on-plone/#comment-3182 davisagli Sat, 07 Mar 2009 17:28:56 +0000 http://david.wglick.org/2009/heads-up-watch-out-for-dependencies-on-plone/#comment-3182 Jorge, that's too bad about the lost time. But mistakes happen, and I tend to think Ross deserves our kudos for fixing the error and making a new release within five hours of when the problem was identified, without (to my knowledge) being directly prompted to do so. Thanks, Ross! Of course, hindsight is 20/20, but it's always a wise idea to have a backup of your site before installing a new add-on product -- this is true for <em>any</em> system. Better luck next time! Jorge, that’s too bad about the lost time. But mistakes happen, and I tend to think Ross deserves our kudos for fixing the error and making a new release within five hours of when the problem was identified, without (to my knowledge) being directly prompted to do so. Thanks, Ross!

Of course, hindsight is 20/20, but it’s always a wise idea to have a backup of your site before installing a new add-on product — this is true for any system.

Better luck next time!

]]> By: Jorge http://david.wglick.org/2009/heads-up-watch-out-for-dependencies-on-plone/#comment-3179 Jorge Sat, 07 Mar 2009 13:56:02 +0000 http://david.wglick.org/2009/heads-up-watch-out-for-dependencies-on-plone/#comment-3179 Want my opinion? Plone is already SO difficult, and with these mistakes, developers are making it impossible to use!! I've lost a week with this error!!!! Shame on you, developer of "flowplayer"!! Jorge. Want my opinion?
Plone is already SO difficult, and with these mistakes, developers are making it impossible to use!! I’ve lost a week with this error!!!!

Shame on you, developer of “flowplayer”!!

Jorge.

]]> By: Ross Patterson http://david.wglick.org/2009/heads-up-watch-out-for-dependencies-on-plone/#comment-3174 Ross Patterson Sat, 07 Mar 2009 06:14:51 +0000 http://david.wglick.org/2009/heads-up-watch-out-for-dependencies-on-plone/#comment-3174 I just released a new version of collective.flowplayer that doesn't depend on Plone. I should probably have waited until eggified Plone had been out for a couple releases before doing that. I just released a new version of collective.flowplayer that doesn’t depend on Plone. I should probably have waited until eggified Plone had been out for a couple releases before doing that.

]]> By: Rok Garbas http://david.wglick.org/2009/heads-up-watch-out-for-dependencies-on-plone/#comment-3170 Rok Garbas Sat, 07 Mar 2009 01:23:20 +0000 http://david.wglick.org/2009/heads-up-watch-out-for-dependencies-on-plone/#comment-3170 good one, i was wondering how to make packages compatible for both 3.1 and 3.2 good one, i was wondering how to make packages compatible for both 3.1 and 3.2

]]> By: Carlos Hanson http://david.wglick.org/2009/heads-up-watch-out-for-dependencies-on-plone/#comment-3168 Carlos Hanson Sat, 07 Mar 2009 00:47:39 +0000 http://david.wglick.org/2009/heads-up-watch-out-for-dependencies-on-plone/#comment-3168 I am proof of success: [zope2] additional-fake-eggs = Plone = 3.1.4 I am proof of success:

[zope2]
additional-fake-eggs =
Plone = 3.1.4

]]>